Wednesday 6 September 2017

The wargaming year 2016-17


The third year of my blog has now been completed and the number of hits continues to grow, up 76% on the previous 12 month period. The USA remains as the leading source of hits (32%), followed by the UK (19%), then France, Australia and Eire (4% each). There is a good worldwide distribution from many far flung places, and I still see bursts from Russia which accounts for 18% of the hits (I assume these are spurious ‘fishing’ hits). The most popular posts remain my reviews, with that for Pikeman’s Lament topping the list, followed by Battlegroup Kursk.

The games I have played this year are listed below:

 
Period
Rules
Type
Scale
2
Ancient
Sword & Spear (Hung v Turk)
Sword & Spear (Greek Hoplites)
Opposed (Lost)
Opposed (Lost)
15mm
15mm
2
Ancient
Basic Impetus 2 (Athns v Thrace)
                        (Sparta v Thessaly)
Opposed (Lost)
Opposed (Lost)
15mm
15mm
2
Dark Ages
SAGA
Opposed (lost; Draw)
28mm
1
Medieval
Lion Rampant (Teutonics)
Solo*
28mm
2
WoR
Bloody Barons
Solo
15mm
1
2
SYW
Maurice
Reveries on the Art of War
Solo
Solo
15mm
2
Napoleonic
Sharp Practice
Solo
28mm
2
Napoleonic
General d’Armee
Solo
28mm
3
ACW
Longstreet
Opposed (Draw)
Opposed (Win)
Opposed (Lost)
15mm
3
WW1
Square Bashing
Solo
15mm
1
RCW
Red Actions
Solo
15mm
14 est.
WW2
Bolt Action
Solo
20mm
2
WW2
Flames of War
Opposed (2x Win)
15mm
1
WW2
Battlegroup - Tobruk
Solo
10mm
2
WW2
Blitzkrieg Commander v3
Solo (France 1940)
Opposed (N.Africa)
6mm
10mm
2
WW2
Blitzkrieg Commander v2
Solo (N.Africa)
10mm
1
Modern Air
CY6 JA
Solo
6mm
2
Vietnam
MCB 2nd edition
Solo trials
20mm
47

 

I have played more games compared to last year (47 compared to 30) and have only played 12 opposed games. My win ratio is OK (4/12) but I have lost more (6/12). My best and most unexpected wins were against Graham using Flames of War, and I will constantly remind him of these victories for many years to come! Meanwhile, Ian and I managed to complete our protracted Longstreet ACW campaign. Very enjoyable (and not just because I won) but, strangely, I don’t think Longstreet will see much more tabletop action; I feel the rules fit well in a mini-campaign setting but are not suitable to one-off, pick-up games. Most of my gaming continues to be solo which is disappointing and is due to an overly packed social diary preventing me from attending club meetings. This was compounded by my regular opponent, Ian, taking a 6 month sabbatical in Kenya.

The game rules that stand out for me this year must be Bolt Action. I know they have been around for ages but I missed out on the earlier enthusiasm, only playing a couple of club games. With the release of the new version I decided to give the system a go. I like the simple streamlined mechanisms which produce a good WW2 game; not as ‘realistic’ as other rules but fast and enjoyable. I can see Bolt Action remaining as my go-to, light WW2 rules for solo play.
I really like the 2nd edition of Men of Company B Vietnam rules and I can see future games occurring next year. The big rules disappointment was Blitzkrieg Commander version 3; a publishing disaster by Pendraken, but to give them their due, they are doing all they can to rectify the situation. A new set of rules I like are General d’Armee and they may provide the solution to my never-ending search for a good set of tactical Napoleonic rules. My judgement is pending because I have yet to play any opposed games using them.
Overall, 2016-17 has been an OK wargame year for me. I really must do better at arranging opposed games. Next year I hope to play some Napoleonics and find out whether General d’Armee lives up to its promise. I am dithering over whether to get the new Sam Mustafa release, ‘Rommel’. I really like Sam’s productions and the clear mechanisms he uses, but I’m not sure I want the high level simulation these rules appear to address. Another potential project for me next year will be getting my pirates on the table (again). The problem revolves around suitable rules. Donnybrook came tantalisingly close to providing the answer, but not quite, I therefore plan to write my own rule set to cover the period and ‘feel’ that I am seeking. I have a few ideas about mechanisms etc., so this might provide a focus and challenge for the year ahead.

No comments:

Post a Comment